[NewMusic] Bassist Paul Rogers on improvised music
jon_raskin at yahoo.com
jon_raskin at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 10 03:43:44 PDT 2008
The needs and frame work of the listener enters into this for me. When I first heard Coltrane it was the record "Om" and I heard boundries that were shattered. Now I hear oranization and how his language on tenor is utilized in the framework of the group and context he has deployed. It was wild and dangerous for me and opened my ears and mind.
Since I didn't know the context of it how it even existed was unfathonable and craziness had to be a part of it.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Goodheart <matthew at matthewgoodheart.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:45:15
To:Bay Area New Music Discussion Group <newmusic at music.mills.edu>
Subject: Re: [NewMusic] Bassist Paul Rogers on improvised music
On Mar 9, 2008, at 3:17 PM, weasel walter wrote:
> i'm not romanticizing mental illness at all. i want less shitty
> music in
> the world and i believe that it may eventually come down to the two
> extremes you've cited.
Point taken, though I'm not so psyched about it, as I think it
destroys some great artists.
> much of my favorite music seems to have come from extremists and
> borderline "sociopaths".
Some of mine too, but certainly not all of it. I can only speak for
myself, but there came a point where I felt the highly romanticized
and maniacal energy substituted for insight or some supposed deep
aesthetic; once the force of the charismatic energy was transparent,
there was less backing it up than was purported to be there. I came
to hear around the edges of them music that there was more illusion
than depth. Consequently, music that did not engage itself with this
same seductive energy became more significant and I heard it in a more
detailed and significant way; the more startling revelation was the
one which did not shout at you, but rather proceeded unnoticed and
allowed you to discover it. The power of the sleeping giant.
Of course everyone's craziness plays into the music they make, but
craziness does not equal depth, and disturbance does make one more or
less of an artist. Unfortunately, we live in an adolescent nature of
our culture romanticizes it and promulgates itself on such simplistic
equations.
But that's just my take- and its a cultural criticism, not one of your
particular aesthetics.
> sadly, we generally do not and cannot care about
> their personal problems - we care about their musical output. i might
> love their music but i may not want to loan them money or let them
> crash
> on my couch or whatever.
>
> ww
>
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:00:27 -0700 Matthew Goodheart
> <matthew at matthewgoodheart.com> writes:
>> Hmmm. . . the romance of mental illness dissipated for me some years
>>
>> ago. . .
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bay Area New Music Discussion Group
> NewMusic at music.mills.edu
> http://music.mills.edu/mailman/listinfo/newmusic
Matthew Goodheart
composer ~ improviser ~ pianist
matthew at matthewgoodheart.com
http://matthewgoodheart.com
http://myspace.com/matthewgoodheart
_______________________________________________
Bay Area New Music Discussion Group
NewMusic at music.mills.edu
http://music.mills.edu/mailman/listinfo/newmusic
More information about the NewMusic
mailing list